<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VerySpatial &#187; GIS_Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veryspatial.com/category/gis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veryspatial.com</link>
	<description>Discussions on Geography and geospatial technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trimble to acquire SketchUp and 3D Warehouse</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2012/04/trimble-to-acquire-sketchup-and-3d-warehouse/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2012/04/trimble-to-acquire-sketchup-and-3d-warehouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VirtualEnvironments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am floored! We talk all the time about the use of SketchUp in building out virtual worlds and have just taken for granted that it was tied in to Google&#8217;s draw for Earth and Maps. Apparently that was not such a given. Trimble will be adding SketchUp and the 3D Warehouse to its growing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ww2.trimble.com/3d/"><img src="http://veryspatial.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/banner_cloud_SketchUp_700-300x112.png" alt="" title="banner_cloud_SketchUp_700" width="300" height="112" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9756" /></a>I am floored! We talk all the time about the use of SketchUp in building out virtual worlds and have just taken for granted that it was tied in to Google&#8217;s draw for Earth and Maps. Apparently that was not such a given. </p>
<p><a href="http://ww2.trimble.com/3d/">Trimble will be adding SketchUp</a> and the 3D Warehouse to its growing pantheon of applications. There are of course short and long term questions from a users perspective regarding the availability of the free version, the licensing costs for the Pro version, the terms of use/copyright rights for 3D Warehouse content, and of course the direction of the software in the future. On the other hand, I am excited about the potential for a tool with the easy to use UI of SketchUp with a better/tighter coupling with GIS applications. Or, how about the ability to use data from existing Trimble hardware and software to streamline model generation.</p>
<p>The SketchUp acquisition is just the most recent in a line of notable acquisitions that include eCognition for Remote Sensing and PeopleNet for logistics, as well as others that link to SketchUp&#8217;s potential such as BIM and StruCAD. </p>
<p>These software trends have been on top of Trimble&#8217;s growing GNSS and a related hardware offerings. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2012/04/trimble-to-acquire-sketchup-and-3d-warehouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zombie Survival Map</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2012/04/zombie-survival-map/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2012/04/zombie-survival-map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WebMapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zombies are cool. Period. That&#8217;s a non-debatable, empirical fact of current pop culture. Like any good citizen, it helps to know what to do in the case of a zombie outbreak. Lucky for us all, one of the more geographic minded of us has released the Zombie Survival Map. The map shows location where zombies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zombies are cool.  Period.  That&#8217;s a non-debatable, empirical fact of current pop culture.  Like any good citizen, it helps to know what to do in the case of a zombie outbreak.  Lucky for us all, one of the more geographic minded of us has released the <a href="http://www.mapofthedead.com/">Zombie Survival Map</a>.  The map shows location where zombies are likely to exist in red (in other words, population centers) and places that are likely to be zombie free in black/grey.  On top of that, the map overlays locations for supplies such as food, shelter, hospitals, and oddly liquor stores.  Although the map is obviously kinda silly (never mind the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/ZOMBIE-OUTBREAK-RESPONSE-VEHICLE-sticker/dp/B003K7MZC6">Zombie Outbreak Response Vehicle</a> I have on my truck), it does highly some important base information for any sort of widespread emergency response issues.  Similar things are being done by state and local governments to help detail routes for evacuation and emergency response.  The map hopes to incorporate user generated data and some point, which will make it even more useful in the case of a natural or man made emergency&#8230;. or if the zombies ever do rise up and attack&#8230;. whichever <img src='http://veryspatial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/04/zombie-survival-maps-show-danger-zones-armories-and-food-sources-for-entire-u-s/">Via Wired</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2012/04/zombie-survival-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lightsquared Saga Continues</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/the-lightsquared-saga-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/the-lightsquared-saga-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lightsquared is not prepared to go gently into the night.  They have hired Theodore Olson (among others) to help argue their case.  Olson is most famous for having successfully argued for Bush in the Bush v. Gore Supreme Court case that settled the 2000 US Presidential election.  In other words, Lightsquared brought out the big guns.  Olson argues that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightsquared is <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/03/lightsquared-hires-bush-v-gore-lawyer-to-save-doomed-4g-network.ars">not prepared</a> to go gently into the night.  They have hired Theodore Olson (among others) to help argue their case.  Olson is most famous for having successfully argued for Bush in the <em>Bush v. Gore</em> Supreme Court case that settled the 2000 US Presidential election.  In other words, Lightsquared brought out the big guns.  Olson argues that government encouraged Lightsquared to invest in a startup technology then slammed the door in their face when final approval was sought.  I&#8217;m not enough of a legal expert to know if Olson&#8217;s argument holds water, but it is rather telling a relatively famous attorney would take up the case.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said in nearly every post in this ongoing saga&#8230;. we&#8217;ll keep you abreast of the situation as news becomes available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/the-lightsquared-saga-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Affordable Virtual Reality?</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/affordable-virtual-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/affordable-virtual-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AugmentedReality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualEnvironments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big part of my research for about a decade now has been exploring the development of immersive virtual landscapes, and how evolving technologies continue to make impressive strides toward creating compelling and believable virtual worlds. One of the issues that has always been at the forefront is the cost of virtual reality hardware, whether [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big part of my research for about a decade now has been exploring the development of immersive virtual landscapes, and how evolving technologies continue to make impressive strides toward creating compelling and believable virtual worlds. One of the issues that has always been at the forefront is the cost of virtual reality hardware, whether it was early attempts at head-mounted displays or immersive rooms, such as CAVE environments. These technologies can give you amazing simulations, but most users can&#8217;t afford to buy the hardware, let alone have the space to set up multi-walled immersive environments. Now, virtual reality technology is increasingly moving toward a consumer experience, with 3D TV&#8217;s, smartphone VR and augmented reality apps, and interface devices like Microsoft&#8217;s Kinect and even Sony&#8217;s Playstation VITA with Augmented Reality (AR) capabilities. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a cool project that I had to share as well. Earlier this month, USC researchers participating in the <a href="http://projects.ict.usc.edu/mxr/blog/off-the-shelf-virtual-reality/">Off-the-Shelf Virtual Reality Workshop</a>, held in conjunction with <a href="http://conferences.computer.org/vr/2012/index.html">IEEE Virtual Reality 2012</a> and organized by the <a href="http://projects.ict.usc.edu/mxr/">Mixed Reality lab at USC</a>, debuted FOV2GO, a portable fold-out smartphone viewer for iPhone and Android (sadly no Windows Phone love) that turns the screen into a 3-D virtual reality system. The viewer is made of cardboard and is easily assembled to look like an old-school ViewMaster, and you insert your smartphone into the FOV2GO and look through the eyepieces for a stereo 3D effect. To create your own 3D virtual environments to explore, there are downloadable software tools that are part of the project as well. I&#8217;d really like to use the FOV2GO in my class, so I&#8217;ll have to find out if they&#8217;ll be available in larger numbers.</p>
<p>This short YouTube video illustrates the FOV2GO in action:</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5n5ov-DKBMA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/affordable-virtual-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panoramic View of Angel Falls, Venezuela</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/panoramic-view-of-angel-falls-venezuela/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/panoramic-view-of-angel-falls-venezuela/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeographyAwareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebMapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve featured AirPano before on the site, but a set they&#8217;ve put up just took my breath away.  They have a wonderful 360 degree air panoramic of Angel Falls in Venezuela.  You can see these falls from the base on up to the top of the waterfall.  The waterfall drops water nearly a half a mile to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Angel Falls" src="http://www.airpano.com/files/Angel-Waterfall-Venezuela/photo/01.jpg" alt="" width="264" height="378" />We&#8217;ve featured <a href="http://www.airpano.com/">AirPano</a> before on the site, but a set they&#8217;ve put up just took my breath away.  They have a wonderful 360 degree air panoramic of <a href="http://www.airpano.com/360Degree-VirtualTour.php?3D=Angel-Waterfall-Venezuela">Angel Falls in Venezuela</a>.  You can see these falls from the base on up to the top of the waterfall.  The waterfall drops water nearly a half a mile to the ground.  It&#8217;s just amazing.  I really liked being able to start at the bast of the fall and virtually travel up via helicopter to the top.  If you&#8217;re really interested in some of the details of the shoot, the link also has a bit of a pholoblog of the shoot and the area.</p>
<p>Unfortunately most of us won&#8217;t have the opportunity to see majestic sites like this in person, so effort<br />
s like the <a href="http://www.airpano.com/Project-AirPano.php">AirPano project</a> can really help us see our amazing world in ways never before possible.  Not everything on the site is geographic (the &#8216;<a href="http://www.airpano.com/360Degree-VirtualTour.php?3D=hotdog">being a sandwich</a>&#8216; one is kinda quirky), but the vast majority cover sites around the globe.  Take some time to explore what they have &#8211; I think you&#8217;ll be blown away by the sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2012/03/panoramic-view-of-angel-falls-venezuela/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightsquared Pretty Much Out Of The Fight</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2012/02/lightsquared-pretty-much-out-of-the-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2012/02/lightsquared-pretty-much-out-of-the-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lightsquared, who last month received a conditional waiver from the FCC on its products, looks like it might be in trouble as the FCC has withdrawn that waiver.  Obviously the FCC acted in response to concerns over GPS interference.  This officially &#8216;kills&#8217; Lightsquared&#8217;s proposed solution to rolling out a 4G-LTE network over the spectrum it owns, baring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightsquared, who last month received a conditional waiver from the FCC on its products, looks like it might be in trouble as the <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/happy-valentines-day-us-government-breaks-up-with-lightsquared.ars">FCC has withdrawn that waiver</a>.  Obviously the FCC acted in response to concerns over GPS interference.  This officially &#8216;kills&#8217; Lightsquared&#8217;s proposed solution to rolling out a 4G-LTE network over the spectrum it owns, baring some sort of miracle intervention from who knows where.</p>
<p>However, I think they&#8217;ve made an interesting counter argument to the GPS interference test results &#8211; <a href="http://www.lightsquared.com/uncategorized/gps-too-big-to-fail/">the GPS industry is too big to fail</a>.  What they&#8217;re effectively arguing is that industrial GPS manufacturers use equipment that over listens to signals, meaning it&#8217;s paying attention to a portion of the spectrum upon they never were licensed to listen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not personally knowledgeable enough about spectrum use in general (and GPS spectrum use in particular) to know if the argument holds any water.  I do think it&#8217;s interesting the FCC chose &#8211; wisely in my opinion &#8211; to preference navigation over cell communications.  However, I believe more knowledgeable heads than mine should certainly investigate Lightsquared&#8217;s claims.  The license of the spectrum really only works if everyone obeys the virtual fences properly.  That&#8217;s true whether GPS is encroaching on Lightsquared&#8217;s territory as Lightsquared believes or whether Lightsquared is encroaching on GPS territory as testing has suggested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2012/02/lightsquared-pretty-much-out-of-the-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Fusion Contest</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2012/02/data-fusion-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2012/02/data-fusion-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Sensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2012 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest is up and running and something that you should think about participating in. While with ever increasing spatial and spectral resolutions in the variety of imagery and elevation data available now-a-days has reduced the need for certain data fusion products, it is also creating new opportunities to fuse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.grss-ieee.org/community/technical-committees/data-fusion/data-fusion-contest/"><img src="http://veryspatial.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/DF_banner-300x155.png" alt="" title="DF_banner" width="300" height="155" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9499" /></a>The <a href="http://www.digitalglobe.com/data-fusion-contest">2012 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest</a> is up and running and something that you should think about participating in. While with ever increasing spatial and spectral resolutions in the variety of imagery and elevation data available now-a-days has reduced the need for certain data fusion products, it is also creating new opportunities to fuse the new data options. This year&#8217;s contest is based on <a href="http://www.digitalglobe.com/data-fusion-contest#/data-specifications">data</a> made available by <a href="http://www.astrium-geo.com/na/">Astrium</a>, <a href="http://www.digitalglobe.com/">Digital Globe</a>, and the <a href="http://lidar.cr.usgs.gov/">USGS CLICK</a>. </p>
<blockquote><p>The Data Fusion Contest is designed to investigate the potential of multi-modal/multi-temporal fusion of very high spatial resolution imagery. This year, participants will download three different sets of images (optical, SAR, and LIDAR) over the downtown of San Francisco and each participant will get to choose their own research topic to work with.</p></blockquote>
<p>The contest is open to everyone and the deadline for submission (of the paper) is May 1, 2012. The <a href="http://www.digitalglobe.com/data-fusion-contest#/how-to-enter">entry details</a> and <a href="http://www.digitalglobe.com/data-fusion-contest#/results-and-prizes">prize list</a> are available on the <a href="http://www.grss-ieee.org/community/technical-committees/data-fusion/data-fusion-contest/">contest website</a>. </p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2012/02/data-fusion-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GPS &#8211; For All The Points</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/gps-for-all-the-points/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/gps-for-all-the-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don&#8217;t feature Real Life Comics that often, but it&#8217;s a funny comic and worth a read&#8230; especially today Plus, I&#8217;ve met Greg Dean (the artist) at a con and he&#8217;s a super nice guy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">We don&#8217;t feature <a href="http://www.reallifecomics.com/">Real Life Comics</a> that often, but it&#8217;s a funny comic and worth a read&#8230; especially today <img src='http://veryspatial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Plus, I&#8217;ve met Greg Dean (the artist) at a con and he&#8217;s a super nice guy.<a href="http://www.reallifecomics.com/archive/111223.html"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.reallifecomics.com/comics/2011/20111223_2792.jpg" alt="" width="336" height="370" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/gps-for-all-the-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LightSquared to Impact 75% of GPS Receivers&#8230;. maybe</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/lightsquared-to-impact-75-of-gps-recievers/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/lightsquared-to-impact-75-of-gps-recievers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s some bad news for LightSquared &#8211; looks like their system will negatively impact the overwhelming majority of GPS receivers currently in operation, based upon a leak of a test report. A series of tests were conducted by the National Telecommunications &#038; Information Administration between Oct. 31 to Nov. 4 confirming this concern. LightSquared fired [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-12/falcone-s-lightsquared-said-to-disrupt-75-of-gps-in-u-s-tests.html">bad news for LightSquared</a> &#8211; looks like their system will negatively impact the overwhelming majority of GPS receivers currently in operation, based upon a leak of a test report.  A series of tests were conducted by the National Telecommunications &#038; Information Administration between Oct. 31 to Nov. 4 confirming this concern.  <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/lightsquared-calls-gps-testing-report-leak-an-outrage.ars">LightSquared fired back</a> suggesting they plan on operating at a lower power point than the tests and that &#8216;interfered&#8217; isn&#8217;t properly defined by the study.  They estimate their new systems will only negatively interact with 10% of existing GPS units.  LightSquared says in a letter, &#8220;The report presents a completely slanted and selective review of the test results. Clearly the leak was intended to prejudge the issue and prejudice public opinion against LightSquared.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be honest, in my opinion, even 10% seems a bit high.  Regulators were withholding approval for the new system in anticipation of this study.  Looks like to me LightSquared better commission a new study PDQ or risk loosing approval for their new systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/lightsquared-to-impact-75-of-gps-recievers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conserving the Night Sky</title>
		<link>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/conserving-the-night-sky/</link>
		<comments>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/conserving-the-night-sky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space (not spatial)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebMapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Dark-Sky Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Night Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Maps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veryspatial.com/?p=9344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is your portion of the night sky polluted by artificial light?  Check out this really slick Google Map interface I found on the International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) web site .  For over 22 years, the IDA has been advocating to keep our night sky clean of light pollution.  Their reasons go beyond astronomy purposes and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your portion of the night sky polluted by artificial light?  Check out this really slick Google Map interface I found on the <a href="http://www.darksky.org/">International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) web site</a> .  For over 22 years, the IDA has been advocating to keep our night sky clean of light pollution.  Their<a href="http://www.darksky.org/about-ida"> reasons</a> go beyond astronomy purposes and have provided resources for legislation that would both reduce night sky lighting and provide very large amounts of energy savings to the global economy.</p>
<div id="attachment_9345" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 390px"><a href="http://www.blue-marble.de/nightlights/2010"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9345  " style="border-width: 2px;border-color: black;border-style: solid" src="http://veryspatial.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/NightSky-300x177.png" alt="Find A Dark Spot Tonight" width="380" height="220" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click on the image to go directly to map viewer</p></div>
<p>Data for the map comes from the <a href="http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/">NGDC</a>, where you can find some <a href="http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/dmsp/maps.html">links to more interactive maps</a> and other imagery services.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veryspatial.com/2011/12/conserving-the-night-sky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

