A pretty interesting article in Nature.com talks about how free tools like Google Earth are changing the way scientists collaborate on projects. The best quote comes from Michael Goodchild when he says, “‘It’s like the effect of the personal computer in the 1970s, where previously there was quite an élite population of computer users,’ Goodchild enthuses. ‘Just as the PC democratized computing, so systems like Google Earth will democratize GIS.’”







I had Michael Goodchild as a professor. He loved Al Gore and his idea of Digital Earth. My friend joked that it would be a question for the final and I said, “yeah right, that’s such an easy question”. It was on the final and I blanked on the answer…
My question is, will Google keep this Open Consortium-like free-for-all around forever. I know it’s not exactly Open GeoSpat. Consortium at this point, but where’s their catch?!
And following that question, do you think Google will ever go Open GeoSpaial Consortium style?
Since I am the moderator I get to respond before Frank (it’s revenge for him taking all the good stuff to say in this weeks wrap-up). I am only going to give my opinion on the OGC question. The OGC’s mission is primarily to support interaction and communication within the community in order to develop open standards. Google on the other hand is utilizing Earth and Local (Maps) to support name recognition. While KML has become an almost de facto standard, it is in the same way that the shapefile has acheived that status, through it being the data standard for the most common (popular) software package (check out SlashGeo’s current poll).
So we are comparing apples (OGC standardization) to oranges (Google maintaing a very popular software package) that all boils down to communication…OGC works with partners to define standards, Google is putting their in-house predefined format(s) out there for people to use.
It will be VERY interesting to see the long term effect of KML on geospatial data. Shapefiles are very close to being the standardized method for storing GIS data. KML (in my opinion) takes this one step further by making it even more accessible to the masses. Writing shapefile tools requires some solid knowledge of programming and working with binary data. KML can be created and edited in a simple text application.